“Why Fewer Americans Are Adopting Chinese”

29 04 2009

Just caught wind of this article on Angry Asian Man, but also on the K@W listserv.

“In 2005, American citizens adopted 7,906 children through the state-run China Center for Adoption Affairs (CCAA). In 2008, that number fell to 3,909 kids.”

Take a look. -GS

Why Fewer Americans Are Adopting Chinese Kids
By KAYLA WEBLEY / HONG KONG Kayla Webley / Hong Kong Tue Apr 28, 10:40 am ET

Becky Freer says adopting a ten-month-old baby girl from China is the best thing she has ever done. When Freer, a 44-year-old resident of Austin, Texas, recently decided to further expand her family by adopting a sister for her now three-and-a-half year old daughter, she thought China was the obvious choice. But as a single woman, Freer is no longer eligible. “Three years ago I was an acceptable parent and now I’m not,” she said. “It seems kind of unfair.”

While her daughter will have a new sister – Freer has since been approved to adopt a child from Ethiopia – she is one of a growing number prospective parents who are unable to adopt from China under new adoption laws Beijing put in place in May 2007. The stricter guidelines, intended to limit the overwhelming number of applicants to China’s well-regarded adoption program, have been effective – international adoptions from China to the U.S. have dropped by 50 percent, according to the U.S. State Department. The new regulations require, among other things, that adoptive parents be married, not classified as clinically obese, under 50, not have taken antidepressant medications in the past two years, not have facial deformities and meet certain educational and economic requirements. In 2005, American citizens adopted 7,906 children through the state-run China Center for Adoption Affairs (CCAA). In 2008, that number fell to 3,909 kids. (See pictures of American children up for adoption.)

But the new laws are only part of the reason that fewer Chinese children are being adopted by American families. While the Chinese government does not release domestic adoption figures, U.S.-based adoption agencies say more Chinese children are also being adopted at home. “You have this cultural shift along with the economic shift, where more and more people can not only afford to adopt a child, but culturally, it’s more accepted,” said Cory Barron, foundation director at Children’s Hope International. Historically, adoption was not socially acceptable or a viable economic option for many families in China. But orphanages were getting more crowded, prompting the government to open up to international adoptions in 1992. Josh Zhong, founder and director of Chinese Children Adoption International in Colorado, remembers what it was like in China just 10 years ago. “You would see hundreds of thousands of children,” he said. “Orphanages begging you to come in, saying, ‘Please help us, these children need to go home.’” A slow shift in gender perception may also be playing a role. While girls still make up 95 percent of children at orphanages, Zhong says that, too, has shifted. “Peoples attitude toward having girls is changing dramatically,” Zhong said. “I have friends [in China] who have girls, and they are just so excited.”

With fewer children being put up for adoption but the foreign demand going strong, China can afford to be more selective. “I think they are saying, you know what, we have fewer children now and so we are looking for better parents,” Zhong says. His organization has experienced a drop from 1,152 China adoptions in 2005 to 422 in 2008. And while Beijing’s new standards may sound harsh to Americans with their hearts set on a baby, they have little influence in the matter. “These are China’s children and they can set the requirement to what they deem is best,” says Barron.

International adoptions in the U.S. gained popularity in the 1990s as families reached out to poorer corners of the world to adopt a child in need. Adoptions increased in not only in countries like China, which has always had a trustworthy system, but also in countries that didn’t have a good system of checks and balances. By 2006, the U.S. began implementing some provisions from the 1994 Hague Convention on Intercountry Adoption, a treaty intended to crack down on abduction, exploitation, sale and trafficking of children. The U.S. went on to fully adopt the regulations in April 2008, and has since stopped processing adoptions from Vietnam, Guatemala, Liberia and Kyrgyzstan until those countries meet the Convention’s standards. At the same time, China tightened its own laws, resulting in a worldwide drop in international adoption from a peak of 22,884 adoptions in 2004 to 17,438 last year.

Adopting a child from the CCAA has never been a simple task. After submitting a long list of required documents, including home studies completed by social workers and federal background checks, applicants’ paperwork is approved by the CCAA and the wait begins. Fees and expenses can amount to upwards of $20,000 before families are cleared to take home their new child. And the wait can be long. Today, China has a backlog of approved applicants from around the world, and is just now placing children into homes of families who were approved for adoption in March 2006.

For some families, that’s too long, and so they look to China’s “waiting child” list of children with special needs, ranging from everything from cleft lips or deafness to more severe physical and mental disabilities. Prospective parents can read about a child’s disability in a national database and decide if it is something they can take on. “Kids who would probably never be adopted in China, and maybe wouldn’t have been adopted in the U.S., are now getting homes,” Barron said. Lee Ann Laune, a 37-year old director of special education programs in Missouri, says she probably looked at more than 100 children over the past two-and-a-half years before finding her daughter, Hope. “When we first got into this, there was a six-to-nine month wait,” Lee Ann said. As time passed, Lee Ann said she and her husband, Paul, would look through the “waiting” children to see if they came across a child that was meant for them. In April, the Launes were approved to adopt Hope, a four-and-a-half year old deaf girl from Hunan province in China. “When we looked into her eyes, it was an automatic for us. It was ‘We can handle this,’” she said. “It’s unbelievable to know we are going to be that saving grace for her.”





Birth Mom Count Down

29 04 2009

It’s official, I will be meeting my birth mom on June 18th at 2:00pm.  And I have to say I’m getting more nervous every day.  The initial excitement is definitely still there, but it’s this fear of the unknown.  Who knows what I’ll find out about my birth family, and who knows what they’ll think of me?

I wish I could stay longer but it’s not in the cards for this trip.  But I know there will be chances to see her again.  Part of me knows that when I get there and meet her I’m not going to want to leave.  I also don’t know if she will be coming alone or with family.  I’m guessing she’ll be alone just because I don’t think she’s told the rest of her family yet and it’s likely that it will take a little while for her to figure out how to do that.

The last puzzle I have left to figure out is what to get her as a gift.  Some people have said that a photo album is good.  I will definitely bring that, but besides that I have no idea what to get her.  It’s like, I want something that will be meaningful to her.  But I don’t know her!  I don’t know what she likes, how she thinks etc.  Some adoptees have said “be ready for money from your birth mother.”  I know that is a possibility, but I will feel horrible if it is the case.  And yes I know, it would be rude for me not to take it, but it just doesn’t sit well with me.

Anyways, I’m looking for gift suggestions from other adoptees.  Anyone had positive experiences with certain types of gifts, or have thoughts on what I should bring?

My last question is how I should document my trip.  Like I said, it will be a very short trip-literally a few days, no joke!  I don’t want to video tape it, but should I bring a digital recorder?  Is that ok, would that be rude?  I just don’t want to miss a single thing.  I want to keep a record of it and possibly have someone help me translate it if possible.  Has anyone done this sort of thing before?  I know some decide to make documentaries, some are more public than others.  But is this something I should consider doing?

Thanks for your thoughts!  -GS





“Raising Katie”

27 04 2009

Thanks to JR for spotting this article that talks about adoption in a different light.  So much of the dialogue around transracial adoption focuses on Caucasian parents who adopt children of color.  However, this article is interesting in the sense that it explores transracial adoption from the point of view of an African American family who adopted a Caucasian child.  What is most revealing perhaps is just how race affects the ways in which this family is perceived in public (which is much different than other adoptive families).

This young girl not only struggles with racism with her peers but a much different type of racism when it comes to how she is perceived with her parents.  People have followed she and her parents out of the mall to make sure she was “ok,” in the cereal aisle she’s been asked “are you ok?” even though her mother was standing right next to her.  What exactly is the message people are sending by suspecting foul play when a Caucasian child is with older African Americans?  What does it mean when racialized stereotypes of African Americans mix in a transracial family?

And of course I have to turn the situation around a bit using my own experiences as an adoptee with Caucasian parents.  Not once do I ever remember my parents being questioned in this sort of way about me.  Maybe it was because Asian transracial adoption was increasingly more common.  (Ok, maybe once at the Canadian border we were questioned once)…but really, the way we are perceived in public is a family-and that is much more that can be said for the Riding family who have learned the hard way that we are NOT living in a post-racial society.

The other layer that has to be peeled back is the reaction with in the African American community to those who choose to not adopt African American children.  The article mentions Dallas Cowboys All-Pro linebacker DeMarcus Ware and his wife, Taniqua who adopted a white child.  DeMarcus apparently received comments saying that they were “self-race-hating individuals.”

Despite their efforts to teach her about her Irish heritage and upbringing in a diverse community, the Ridings do admit they feel that perhaps in some ways they feel that Katie should be with parents who look like her.  Since the NABSW first spoke out against transracial adoption in the 70′s, it has continued to be a hot topic when it comes to domestic adoption.  Why has this question never fully been addressed when it comes to Intercountry transracial adoption?

These are all questions that don’t necessarily have complete answers-mostly, they just lead to more questions left unanswered.  I just thought I’d show this article to highlight just how complicated race is for adoptees and for their families.  I’m sure many of you have encountered situations where you have been made to feel uncomfortable about yourself or your family so this probably isn’t a new concept for you.  I want to hear what you all think about this article.

GS

Raising Katie

Newsweek Web Exclusive

Several pairs of eyes follow the girl as she pedals around the playground in an affluent suburb of Baltimore. But it isn’t the redheaded fourth grader who seems to have moms and dads of the jungle gym nervous on this recent Saturday morning. It’s the African-American man—six feet tall, bearded and wearing a gray hooded sweatshirt—watching the girl’s every move. Approaching from behind, he grabs the back of her bicycle seat as she wobbles to a stop. “Nice riding,” he says, as the fair-skinned girl turns to him, beaming. “Thanks, Daddy,” she replies. The onlookers are clearly flummoxed.

As a black father and adopted white daughter, Mark Riding and Katie O’Dea-Smith are a sight at best surprising, and at worst so perplexing that people feel compelled to respond. Like the time at a Pocono Mountains flea market when Riding scolded Katie, attracting so many sharp glares that he and his wife, Terri, 37, and also African-American, thought “we might be lynched.” And the time when well-intentioned shoppers followed Mark and Katie out of the mall to make sure she wasn’t being kidnapped. Or when would-be heroes come up to Katie in the cereal aisle and ask, “Are you OK?”—even though Terri is standing right there.

Is it racism? The Ridings tend to think so, and it’s hard to blame them. To shadow them for a day, as I recently did, is to feel the unease, notice the negative attention and realize that the same note of fear isn’t in the air when they attend to their two biological children, who are 2 and 5 years old. It’s fashionable to say that the election of Barack Obama has brought the dawn of a post-racial America. In the past few months alone, The Atlantic Monthly has declared “the end of white America,” The Washington Post has profiled the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People’s struggle for relevance in a changing world, and National Public Radio has led discussions questioning the necessity of the annual Black History Month. Perhaps not surprising, most white and black Americans no longer cite racism as a major social problem, according to recent polls.

But the Ridings’ experience runs counter to these popular notions of harmony. And adoption between races is particularly fraught. So-called transracial adoptions have surged since 1994, when the Multiethnic Placement Act reversed decades of outright racial matching by banning discrimination against adoptive families on the basis of race. But the growth has been all one-sided. The number of white families adopting outside their race is growing and is now in the thousands, while cases like Katie’s—of a black family adopting a nonblack child—remain frozen at near zero.

Decades after the racial integration of offices, buses and water fountains, persistent double standards mean that African-American parents are still largely viewed with unease as caretakers of any children other than their own—or those they are paid to look after. As Yale historian Matthew Frye Jacobson has asked: “Why is it that in the United States, a white woman can have black children but a black woman cannot have white children?”

That question hit home for the Ridings in 2003, when Terri’s mother, Phyllis Smith, agreed to take in Katie, then 3, on a temporary basis. A retired social worker, Phyllis had long been giving needy children a home—and Katie was one of the hardest cases. The child of a local prostitute, her toddler tantrums were so disturbing that foster families simply refused to keep her. Twelve homes later, Katie was still being passed around. Phyllis was in many ways an unlikely savior. The former president of the Baltimore chapter of the National Association of Black Social Workers, she joined her colleagues in condemning the adoption of black children by white families as “cultural genocide”—a position she still holds in theory, if not in practice. She couldn’t say no to the “charming, energetic” girl who ended up on her front doorstep.

Last November, after a grueling adoption process—”[adoption officials] pushed the envelope on every issue,” says Mark—little Irish-Catholic Katie O’Dea, as pale as a communion wafer, became Katie O’Dea-Smith: a formally adopted member of the African-American Riding-Smith family. (Phyllis is her legal guardian, but Mark and Terri were also vetted as legal surrogates for Phyllis.)

To be sure, it’s an unconventional arrangement. Katie spends weekdays with Phyllis, her legal guardian. But Mark and Terri, who live around the corner, are her de facto parents, too. They help out during the week, and welcome Katie over on weekends and holidays. As for titles: Katie calls Phyllis “Mommy” and Terri “Sister,” since technically it’s true. Mark has always been “Daddy” or “Mark.”

“Let me just put it out there,” says Mark, a 38-year-old private-school admissions director with an appealing blend of megaphone voice and fearless opinion, especially when it comes to his family. “I’ve never felt more self-consciously black than while holding our little white girl’s hand in public.” He used to write off the negative attention as innocent curiosity. But after a half-decade of rude comments and revealing faux pas—like the time his school’s guidance counselor called Katie a “foster child” in her presence—he now fights the ignorance with a question of his own: why didn’t a white family step up to take Katie?

Riding’s challenge hints at a persistent social problem. “No country in the world has made more progress toward combating overt racism than [the United States],” says David Schneider, a Rice University psychologist and the author of “The Psychology of Stereotyping.” “But the most popular stereotype of black people is still that they’re violent. And for a lot of people, not even racist people, the sight of a white child with a black parent just sets off alarm signals.”

Part of the reason for the adoptive imbalance comes down to numbers, and the fact that people tend to want children of their own race. African-Americans represent almost one third of the 510,000 children in foster care, so black parents have a relatively high chance of ending up with a same-race child. (Not so for would-be adoptive white parents who prefer the rarest thing of all in the foster-care system: a healthy white baby.) But the dearth of black families with nonblack children also has painful historical roots. Economic hardship and centuries of poisonous belief in the so-called civilizing effects of white culture upon other races have familiarized Americans with the concept of white stewardship of other ethnicities, rather than the reverse.

The result is not only discomfort among whites at the thought of nonwhites raising their offspring; African-Americans can also be wary when one of their own is a parent to a child outside their race. Just ask Dallas Cowboys All-Pro linebacker DeMarcus Ware and his wife, Taniqua, who faced a barrage of criticism after adopting a nonblack baby last February. When The New York Times sports page ran a photo of the shirtless new father with what appeared to be a white baby in his arms (and didn’t mention race in the accompanying story), it sent a slow shock wave through the African-American community, pitting supporters who celebrated the couple’s joy after three painful miscarriages against critics who branded the Wares “self-race-hating individuals” for ignoring the disproportionate number of blacks in foster care. The baby, now their daughter, Marley, is in fact Hispanic. “Do you mean to tell me that the Wares couldn’t have found a little black baby to adopt?” snarled one blogger on the Daily Voice, an online African-American newspaper.

For the relatively few black families that do adopt non-African-American children, and the adoptive children themselves, the experience can be confusing. “I hadn’t realized how often we talked about white people at home,” says Mark. “I hadn’t realized that dinnertime stories were often told with reference to the race of the players, or that I often used racial stereotypes, as in the news only cares about some missing spring-break girl because she is blonde.’”

Katie, too, has sometimes struggled with her unusual situation, and how outsiders perceive it. When she’s not drawing, swimming or pining after teen heartthrob Zac Efron, she’s often dealing with normal kid teasing with a nasty edge. “They’ll ignore me or yell at me because I have a black family,” she says. Most of her friends are black, although her school is primarily white. And Terri has noticed something else: Katie is uncomfortable identifying people by their race.

Is she racially confused? Should her parents be worried? Opinions vary in the larger debate about whether race is a legitimate consideration in adoption. At present, agencies that receive public funding are forbidden from taking race into account when screening potential parents. They are also banned from asking parents to reflect on their readiness to deal with race-related issues, or from requiring them to undergo sensitivity training. But a well-meaning policy intended to ensure colorblindness appears to be backfiring. According to a study published last year by the Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institute, transracial parents are often ill equipped to raise children who are themselves unprepared for the world’s racial realities.

Now lawmakers may rejoin the charged race-adoption debate. Later this year the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, an independent federal think tank, is expected to publish a summary of expert testimony on adoption law—much of which will ask Congress to reinstate race as a salient consideration in all cases. The testimony, from the Evan B. Donaldson institute and others, will also suggest initiatives currently banned or poorly executed under existing policies, including racial training for parents and intensifying efforts to recruit more black adoptive families.

Would such measures be a step back for Obama’s post-racial America? It’s hard to tell. The Ridings, for their part, are taking Katie’s racial training into their own hands. They send her to a mixed-race school, and mixed-race summer camps, celebrate St. Patrick’s Day with gusto and buy Irish knickknacks, like a “Kiss Me I’m Irish” T shirt and a mug with Katie’s O’Dea family crest emblazoned on it. But they worry it won’t be enough. “All else being equal, I think she should be with people who look like her,” says Mark. “It’s not fair that she’s got to grow up feeling different when she’s going to feel different anyway. She wears glasses, her voice is a bit squeaky, and on top of that she has to deal with the fact that her mother is 70 and black.”

But even if Katie feels different now, the Riding-Smiths have given her both a stable home and a familiarity with two ethnic worlds that will surely serve her well as she grows up in a country that is increasingly blended. And it may be that hers will be the first truly post-racial generation.





Baby inside a Baby inside a Baby

8 04 2009

Ok.  It’s time for a laugh.  Thanks to the Korean Adoptees Worldwide listserve for this SNL clip.  Enjoy – GS





Adoptee Bloggers

1 04 2009

I can’t believe that it has been several years since I started this blog.  For me it started as a way to connect with other adoptees, share my story, and learn from others.  Today, I’ve found myself thrown into a new journey, and one that I can honestly say would not have happened with out the support I’ve found from the people I have met through my blog.

Many of us grow up in isolation.  Separated not only from our birth parents, but from a community of others like us.  My parents always told my sisters and I that we were not alone-that there were many just like us out there feeling the same way going through the same things.  But I always wondered where they were, and why were we here by ourselves?

Starting my blog was a way for me to talk about my experiences but to also find strength from the many others who felt isolated growing up as well.  I’m so happy to see so many other new bloggers starting their own journeys and finding their own voices.  My blog started as a self-exploration but ultimately I decided it was meant to be a resource for others.  This may seem like a rambling post, and for that I apologize.  But I just wanted to thank all of you from the bloggers to the supportive non-adoptees and my devoted readers for sustaining such a vibrant online community.  I’ll be back soon with another post with a little more content I promise!  -GS








Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 30 other followers